Pahalgam Attack Sparks Nationwide Debate: Is It Time for a New Kashmir Doctrine?
As India reels from the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, political discourse has moved swiftly from condemnation to deeper introspection. At the center of this shift is Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, who has called for a special Parliament session to fundamentally reassess India’s Kashmir policy.
The attack, carried out by a group of militants believed to be associated with Pakistan-backed terror outfits, was not only deadly but also symbolic. By targeting tourists and allegedly segregating them based on religious identity, the assailants aimed to reignite communal fear and international attention.
Kharge’s intervention has stirred the political establishment—and rightly so, according to observers who say the government’s current Kashmir doctrine is long overdue for revision.
A Call for Rethinking Strategy
“Peace cannot be declared into existence. It must be built, protected, and constantly recalibrated,” Kharge said in his address following the attack. He pointed out that despite repeated proclamations of normalcy, attacks like Pahalgam and Rajouri prove that militant networks remain operational and emboldened.
He urged the Modi government to be transparent about current risks and involve Parliament in formulating a forward-looking policy. “Let us not pretend that peace is permanent while terrorists plot in our blind spots,” he warned.
A Bipartisan Framework for National Security
Kharge’s proposal includes the establishment of a bipartisan Kashmir Task Force made up of MPs, retired military officials, and civil society members. This body would operate parallel to existing agencies but offer policy recommendations and regional feedback.
Support for such an initiative has come from unexpected quarters. Senior JD(U) leader and Bihar CM Nitish Kumar said, “If we do not involve all political voices now, we risk deepening the disconnect between policy and reality.”
The idea also has the backing of security professionals who note that political inclusivity could enhance intelligence and civic cooperation.
Human Rights and Counterterrorism: A Fine Balance
Another area of concern is the civil rights environment in Jammu and Kashmir. Post-370 abrogation, the region has seen increased surveillance, internet restrictions, and preventive detentions. While intended as counterterrorism measures, Kharge argues that this heavy-handed approach may be driving alienation rather than security.
“Fear cannot be the foundation of peace. We must engage Kashmiri youth, empower their communities, and show that India’s democracy includes them fully,” he said.
Kharge proposes targeted scholarships, youth exchanges, and new civil society partnerships to combat radicalization at the grassroots level.
International Implications
The Pahalgam attack has once again placed India’s handling of Kashmir under international scrutiny. Western capitals including Washington and London have condemned the violence, but some international human rights organizations have raised concerns about India’s domestic response.
By initiating a special Parliament session, Kharge believes India could signal strength and openness—two qualities that bolster its global standing. “What stronger message can we send to the world than a united Parliament confronting terror with resolve?” he asked.
On the Ground: Anxiety and Fatigue
Kashmiri citizens, especially those in the tourism sector, are now caught in the crossfire—literally and metaphorically. While they long for peace, they also fear being stigmatized yet again.
“Every time something happens, it feels like we go ten years backward,” said Rizwan Khan, a trekking guide in Anantnag. “We want to be part of India’s growth story—not a footnote in its terror narrative.”
Kharge’s plan includes setting up a Civilian Coordination Cell in Kashmir that would act as a local grievance redressal system, bridging the gap between citizens and Delhi.
Conclusion: An Opportunity Amid Tragedy?
While the Pahalgam attack is undoubtedly a tragedy, political analysts believe it has opened the door to reform. Kharge’s demand for a special session is not just a response to an incident—it’s a call to reimagine how India secures and integrates one of its most volatile regions.
Whether or not the Modi government responds positively, the issue is now a matter of public debate. And in a democracy, that may be the first step toward meaningful change.
